TO record the documents was bas on the technical and human resources available at the time. A conscious decision was made not to include full texts, as it was believ this was not the mandate of the LBA and would therefore not add any value to the collection in terms of the LBA’s objectives. [5] However, attempts were already made in 1989 to enable systematic, computer-assist examination of the documents. [6] One example is the systematic recording of issuers, recipients, and co-seals of documents. These were divid, where possible thailand phone number library , into the categories of spiritual and secular and assign to different ranks bas on an ordinal number (see Table 1 ).The selection of
Similar standardizations were also
A implement for other metadata fields, such as “sorting date,” “seal,” “transmission history,” and “format.” Each of these fields serv to prepare as much information as possible in such a way that it could be present in the most user-friendly way possible, as well as being machine-readable. While machine-readable . A processing primarily serv to index the documents for searches, it was also us in a few cases for quantitative analyses, . A as Bischoff’s contribution shows. However, this requir a manual extraction of the entire inventory . A at that time, as the database software did . A not provide appropriate interfaces.
[ 10 ]The LBA database had been making digital copies of the
A document images available to users online since 2008. However, the resolution was artificially ruc, and the search engine optimization united states america original TIFF files were only available upon request and for a fee. Gradually, however, the kleio database system became outdat, and further development could not be guarante in Marburg. Initially, only a few on the home page we find the classic elements : functions, such as personal access, workbooks, and order forms, had to be disabl, but soon there was a threat of the system being shut down completely. [7]